iconLog In  |  Register

How to build your own Bible

The great thing about shopping for almost anything in America is the nearly infinite number of options and choices the consumer has. For example, if you're shopping for a car, you might start with its make (e.g. Chevy, Ford, or perhaps a foreign brand), then you might consider its model (Cavalier, Impala, etc.), then there is the type of engine (Hemi, V6, etc.), and the transmission (manual or automatic). Finally, of course, you choose a color and a wide variety of options such as power windows, CD player, or leather seats.

Options and choices are available for just about anything you want to buy: computers, cell phones, even bread.

But options and choices do not exist when one goes Bible shopping. Sure, you can buy Bibles with different covers, or with pictures and maps. You can even buy different translations of the Bible. But the actual books of the Bible are always the same. It always begins with Genesis and ends with Revelation.

And that is utterly ridiculous.

Granted, there is a slight variation between the Protestant and Catholic Bibles. While the Protestant Bible is a collection of 66 books (39 in the Old Testament and 27 in the New), the Catholic (and Orthodox) Bibles contain an additional set of books called the Deuterocanonical writings which gives their Bible a total of 73 books.

But these two versions of the Bible — Protestant or Catholic — are the only choices we have in the world of Bible shopping. And it's not even really a major difference. One version simply has an extra seven books.

This is a sad state of affairs for heretics such as myself, but really it should be an affront to everyone who wants to buy a Bible. Why are there only 66 to 73 books in the Bible and why are they always the same ones? Why do people stand for this? Would you like it if you went to buy a new album on CD (or download it to your iPod) but then realized that you could buy only Barry Manilow's greatest hits? Oh, you could change the cover if you wanted so it could look like Abbey Road by The Beatles, but the actual music would still be Barry Manilow.

That's what Bible shopping is like.

We need options and choices. I may not want, say, the book of Esther in my Bible (really, it doesn't even talk about God!), but the Bible monopoly has decided everyone gets Esther. Or maybe I'd like the Gospel of Thomas in my Bible, but no, it can't be added because it's a gnostic writing.

Then there's the whole problem of all the mistakes and contradictions that are in the Bible. In most sectors of the publishing industry, when mistakes are found in a published book, they're corrected in later editions. Not so with Bible publishing. For example, we've known about the errors in the Bibles' account of how life formed on Earth for over 100 years, but no Bible publishers have bothered correcting it.

It's unconscionable.

The way I see it, the whole problem is that Bibles are produced only for the placid, unthinking Christians who believe everything they're told. Well, what about us heretics? What about we Christians who have learned to think critically and ask questions? Where are the gnostic gospels? Where are the writings from Jewish Kabbalah? There are so many books that could be — and should be — in the Bible, but aren't because the Bible publishing industry is controlled by a theological and ecclesiastical monopoly that, in its arrogance, has decided what everyone needs to read.

It is a huge problem and, frankly, I'm surprised the government hasn't stepped in to put an end to it (must have something to do with that pesky notion of separation of church and state).

Whatever.

Anyway, until the day comes when the Bible publishing monopoly is broken, I'm going to do what I can to help. People need to realize that they don't have to buy a Bible that has been pre-assembled with a fixed number of books.

You can build your own Bible.

It's really quite easy once you've gotten rid of the idea that the Bible is a fixed, unchanging canon. It's not. People have simply forgotten how (or been afraid) to argue. The early Jews and Christians argued all the time about what should be in the canon. But, at some point, one group won out, basically by labeling the others as heretics and burning them at the stake.

But heresy is coming back into vogue. Heresy will soon be the new orthodoxy, just as what was radical and liberal fifty years ago is conservative and commonplace today. It's just a matter of time.

And today, building your own Bible is even easier thanks to the Internet. All of the canonical and most of the non-canonical writings (for both Judaism and Christianity) are already out there in cyberspace. All you have to do is find the ones you want, copy and paste them into one document, and print. Then, voila! You have your own custom-made Bible with only the books that you want to read. You can also change the order of the books, as well as fix all those mistakes that should have been proofread and edited 2,000 years ago.

Heck, you don't even have to stick with the traditional Judeo-Christian writings. If something speaks to you and you feel it is inspired by God, then you just go right ahead and put it in your Bible.

That's what the early Christians did.


5 comments

P. Gregory Springer avatar featured_post

P. Gregory Springer

#1

Chuang-tse meets Jesus.

username

Samuel Amato

#2

I don’t assume you expect the people you are preaching to (the Christians ‘who believe everything they’re told’) to do this, you acknowledge your consciousness of this in the article itself, so I take it as a joke, or an analogy, or a joke-analogy. I take most of the article as a joke that is supposed to make a point, as typical signifiers of various types of ‘humour’ have been incorporated (perhaps dry humour, but humour nonetheless), but the feeling that ‘there is an issue here’ still pervades the entire piece.
I accept this. It can be effective, the joke-analogy is a legitimate form; however, the ‘there is an issue here’ undertone sort of invalidates it, as it appears that the Issue is more important (to you) than the joke. The joke seems to be your way of engaging the topic in an interesting way. Again, I accept this. I do not know if it is effective in creating ‘change’, though, and change seems to be the goal of the piece, as the Issue is more important than the joke.
The Issue is certainly valid: many Christians don’t actually engage with the Bible and understand their own beliefs. Many simply hide behind platitudes and hope that no one notices them floating by. This is a great concern of many, if not all, churches. These ‘floaters’ are typically called out in through more platitudes in large group settings where nothing will really happen except perhaps a small assignation of temporary guilt. So, yes, this is a real, inherent problem in the Christian situation.
But will they live differently because of a joke-analogy opinion piece that proposes actions they deem heretical? Maybe they’d band together with their small group and talk about ‘what was wrong’ in the piece, or call in to their local Christian radio station, or write their own article about the infallibility of the Bible, but live differently? I can’t see it coming from the typically knee-jerk Christian reaction, from someone who feels the need to live like Jesus and flip over tables in the tabernacle and become filled with righteous anger and Do Great Things For God*. Coming from someone that is already disposed to agreeing with you? Yes. But from the people that you have an Issue with? No.
Actually getting people to live differently is hard. I don’t know how to do it. I don’t know if many people do. We all like to yell at each other when we see or hear something we disagree with. It’s instinct. I do it more than most people, I’d say. I’m terribly opinionated (I’m posting this comment, aren’t I?), and it’s hard not to want to tell people they’re wrong. I don’t know how to get over it. So, I know how you feel: desiring change and wanting to just scream at everyone you see messing up. It so terribly rewarding in the immediate. I just don’t know if it causes any real ‘progress’ or ‘change’. It almost seems regressive to me.


*Not that this is bad or morally wrong or anything—I’m not trying to portray Christians in a bad way here. I just don’t see the people ‘who believe everything they’re told’ reacting in any other way than doing what they’ve seen done by the person they continually compare themselves to. It just sort of inevitable given, well, just about everything: the way they are taught to believe, the way they actually believe, etc. Certainly a lot of things Christianity teaches are good.

Rob McColley avatar featured_post

Rob McColley

#3

It’s preposterous to say “many Christians don’t understand their own beliefs.” You can’t believe in something without knowing it.
 
I also find it bizarre to suggest that churches and individuals concern themselves with their members’ deviation from scripture. Most American churchgoers are apatheists. They go to church because it’s what people do, or for their kids, or because they hope to sell more insurance policies.
 
The churches are just happy to have them there. The churches are especially happy if they give money.
 
As for Ryan’s column, I tend to agree. Believing in the bible is nearly impossible. The bible is like a universal healthcare bill—too many authors, too much contradiction.
 
Bart Ehrman’s analysis is instructive. Thank god(lessness) someone devoted his life to studying this stuff and then giving an analysis not punished on the rack, the Catherine wheel, beheading, or any other torture device conjured by the godly to “cure” the apostate.

username

Jill Schreiber

#4

Kind of like Thomas Jefferson eh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

username

Al Rennert

#5

There have been plenty of other bibles written.  They just have different titles.

Most Recent Opinion Comments

isaac arms avatar

hey, if hair ain’t gon’ be over your head, my jokes may as well be.

{username}

Okay, almost 24 hours later and I finally got Issac’s Summer joke. I’m an idiot.

{username}

Swap the dog for a fire pit and it sounds like you’re writing about my back yard. Very nice.

isaac arms avatar

funny, as your summer begins, another Summer ends.

{username}

And that, my friend, is love. Bob, I think I still owe you for my wedding cake, served in 1998. But nevermind.

{username}

I believe the kiss between Rob and I was documented on low-quality videotape in the mid-ninties porn classic, Dirty Harry…and Sticky.

Tracy Nectoux avatar

“Do I have to sign some forms, or am I just considered ‘in.’” You’re in!

{username}

Got damn, Coulter. You are the greatest.

Rob McColley avatar

I have no specific memory of it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if I’d kissed Mike, too—once we’d both drunk ourselves gay. And earlier this week I gave Clarence Shelley a back rub. Do I have to sign some forms, or am I just considered “in.”

{username}

FWIW, I got a copy of the letter in question.  It was written in a way that would be plausible to a casual reader who didn’t scrutinize it too carefully.  It announced the formation of an organization called G.L.A.B.A. (which actually exists), and had discussion about typical…

Most Recent Comments

Mike Ingram avatar

Oh nice!  I’d totally vote for Matt Campbell!

Rob McColley avatar

“Smile Politely sports writer announces candidacy for city government.”

{username}

I also got to visit Big Grove Tavern during the soft open and definitely enjoyed the pork belly the most of all the dishes I sampled. The cheesy grits and the vinegary pickled vegetables were a perfect compliment to the rich pork belly.

Michael Feltes avatar

The Alan Partridge lookalike on the right in the first small photo has nothing to condescend to anyone about. AH HA!

{username}

Snell and the little Hitlers of the neighborhood association need to chill out. Legitimate businesses should have the freedom to exist without having to endure the slings and arrows of ignorant and misguided opposition.

isaac arms avatar

represent, Matt.

{username}

Yeah, I’d agree that Transporter Room 3 is the worst house venue I’ve ever seen.

{username}

Food trucks are the start-up, small businesses of the future for those unable to afford real estate. No surprise, that merchants who pay rent, utilities, and maintenance on a property would despise the traveling competition. Or developers who build more empty retail spaces would want to close…

{username}

Not so much far-right Tea Party as a balanced, moderate viewpoint between letting businesses succeed and protecting society with reasonable regulations. In spite of what the city reps are saying, the interpretation of policy on this issue certainly has changed. Letting a business start up under one…

Rob McColley avatar

I think it’s neat that SP has turned rightward, now espousing a Tea Party-style frustration with government regulations & taxes.

Annie Weisner avatar

This makes me so sad.  (Happy to live in Urbana, though!)  Crave Truck has been a GREAT addition to the food choices in C-U, and it’d be a travesty to chase them away.  This town should be supporting small businesses.  I’m glad to hear that they’ll still…

{username}

*slow. clap.* Still offering no threat of intelligence…. I know I said I thought you should just write this whole column yourself next year, Isaac, but now that you’ve gone and taken a “part deux” run at it, I’d like to modify my request: Best Music 2013,…

isaac arms avatar

Actually, it’s kind of nice, the quiet.  John Heoffleur’s engaging commentary/dialogue is sorely missed, however. In lieu of someone intelligent saying something, I’ve compiled a list of Honourable Mentions: BEST ROCK BAND: Take Care ::these gentlemen have four completely different sets at their disposal right now (which…

isaac arms avatar

What?  Echo! (Echo!) Where’s the dischord and dissent?

Mike Ingram avatar

This weekend will mark the first appearance of Kayla Brown’s Fire Doll Candle booth at the Market.  Check it:  http://www.facebook.com/firedollcandles

{username}

And without bloodshed. Sounds like the Savoy trustees aren’t as narrow-minded as some of their whiny pants constituents. Do you think quack Snell is already planning an asinine counterattack or is he still laying low after those “threats” against his person?

isaac arms avatar

hey, if hair ain’t gon’ be over your head, my jokes may as well be.

{username}

Okay, almost 24 hours later and I finally got Issac’s Summer joke. I’m an idiot.

isaac arms avatar

Excellent.  I am glad sometimes American dreams are encouraged, rather than stifled.

{username}

Swap the dog for a fire pit and it sounds like you’re writing about my back yard. Very nice.

Log In



Auto-login on future visits

Forgot your password?